-
Categories
-
Archives
- August 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- August 2007
- July 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- July 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
-
Meta
W3C and Atom
The Courtship of Atom by Kendall Grant Clark (XML.com) reports on the W3C/Atom discussions – would the W3C be a good home for it? I attended the 2004-05-18 ad-hoc meeting in New York that Kendall mentions. I don’t think the Atom people necessarilly see the semantic web activity as the natural home, but it might be the most appropriate at this time. A new W3C Activity is a big deal. My primary interest is in the Atom API, since RSS1.0 is fine for my data needs. The API might link nicely to the RDF Data Access WG work.